NDPS Act and Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Drugs
NDPS Act and Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Drugs
Authored By:
Ankur Saini
Advocate
Mob. +91 9999055488
The Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, serves as a key enforcement tool in
India for addressing illegal drug activities. Below are the main aspects of the
forfeiture process for illegally acquired drugs:
1. Prohibition: The NDPS Act strictly prohibits the manufacture, sale,
and possession of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, except for
authorized medical or scientific purposes.
2. Seizure Authority: Law enforcement agencies are empowered to
confiscate drugs that are unlawfully held or trafficked, which can happen
during raids or investigations.
3. Forfeiture Procedure: Following a seizure, a formal procedure is
initiated, requiring adherence to legal protocols, including maintaining a
chain of custody and documenting the seizure properly.
4. Judicial Oversight: The seized drugs undergo judicial examination,
where the court evaluates evidence to determine the legality of their
possession.
5. Confiscation Orders: If deemed illegal, the court can order the
confiscation of the drugs, ensuring they are destroyed or disposed of in
compliance with legal standards.
6. Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB): The NCB plays a vital role in
enforcing the NDPS Act, overseeing drug-related operations and ensuring
adherence to international drug control agreements.
7. Appeals Process: Individuals facing forfeiture can appeal court
decisions, allowing for a judicial review to uphold fairness and legal
standards.
8. Penalties: The Act imposes severe penalties for violations,
including fines and imprisonment, acting as a deterrent against drug offenses.
Key Supreme Court Judgments
1. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1994):
Established that the prosecution
bears the burden of proof to demonstrate that the seized substances are indeed
narcotic drugs, stressing the importance of proper seizure procedures.
2. Mohd. Ameer Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2008):
Affirmed that possession of even
small quantities of drugs can incur severe penalties, highlighting the strict
liability aspect of the NDPS Act.
3. Union of India v. K. R. Sriram (2008):
Clarified that forfeiture
provisions apply to minor quantities as well, emphasizing the necessity for
proper documentation during seizures.
4. Ashwani Kumar v. State of Punjab (2010):
Reinforced the NDPS Act’s
objective of combatting drug trafficking, asserting that confiscation is
crucial for deterrence.
5. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sunil Kumar (2018):
The Court underscored the state’s
strong interest in enforcing drug laws and the critical role of forfeiture in
public safety by eliminating illegal drugs from circulation.
The Supreme Court of India has
consistently supported the NDPS Act’s stringent provisions related to the
forfeiture of illegally acquired drugs. The judiciary has emphasized the need
for due legal processes, integrity in evidence handling, and effective
enforcement of drug laws. Ultimately, the NDPS Act aims to reduce drug
trafficking and abuse through strict regulatory and enforcement mechanisms.
Comments
Post a Comment